The evolution of technology and innovative ideas of various scientist have made gagets more sophisticated. It has become an essential part of everyone’s life across the world. In my view updated with upgraded innovation is important but it can cause a lot of issues to the environment.
First, people nowadays are very fond of changing their tech appliances every year. Due to technology improvement and enhancement of new upgraded versions are being launched in different devices very frequently. Some people consider it as their social status to keep the trendy new launched phones, laptops and other such gagets. For example, one of my friend change her mobile phone very frequently, asa soon as new iphone x was launched; Although she brought her iphone 8 just a few months back, she did this just to show people that she is the one who brought it on the first time in our friends circle.
On the other hand, technology is harming our environment majorly. Although, different tech stuff are being designed to work properly for a longer period like usually mobile phones work at least for 3 years, laptops for almost 10 years and so on. But most people use their phones for just a year and the they are no use and they throw them away. All these high amount of gagets discarded as garbage even before the expiry. For example, lithium batteries can work as explosive at a high temperature and aluminum can effect the soil which lead to a cause of soil erosion, effecting nature badly.
In conclusion, I would like to say that discard of old gagets will lead to major environmental issues. so buying new appliances without requirement is not a beneficial decision for the humankind,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l status to keep the trendy new launched phones, laptops and other such gagets. F...
^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'they'?
Suggestion: the; they
...le use their phones for just a year and the they are no use and they throw them away. Al...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...ill lead to major environmental issues. so buying new appliances without requireme...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, at least, for example, in conclusion, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87543252595 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71228633599 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61937716263 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0433027435 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0979922216248 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324279776089 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464498818598 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0517251422294 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534156884391 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.