Children's find time for a variety of activities, which depends up on their age and interests. There is an existing argument that these activities should be educational, otherwise it will be time wasting. Interrupting children's preferance, will disrupt their autonomy and physical development.
Firstly, as I mentioned early, kids choose their leisure's according to their age and peer group influence, are not necessarily educational. If we are forcing them to follow certain rules or purpose, it can make them down or feeling controlled, thus it will spoil their autonomy to take decisions. This type of control can only bring negative impacts in kids life; along with it will waste their valuable time. For instance, a child interested to draw pictures, but his parents forcing him to read some books, will not give a fruitful effect; the child might get exhausted from their pressures and won't do either.
Secondly, Children's mental and physical development's depend on their choice of activities, hence forcing them to do other activities than their intersets, will make hindrance in their physical development's. Proper physical and psychological maturity is vital in attaining academic excellence in a later stage, are tampered by disrupting their growth. For example physical exercises, sports are integral parts in physical development; even though it seems like no educational values, it's indirect contribution's are enormous.
Overall, one cannot force children to follow only certain kind of activities that have educational value, Incontrast let them decide choices which will bring benefits in their later life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.496 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89986482444 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.66 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3945418128 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.909090909 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119200838393 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529205085522 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443026603902 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803965746338 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460481484703 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.