Some people believe that face to face communication is always more powerful than written communication. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples.
While written communications are widely used these days for personal and business relationships, some argue in favor of face to face meetings. I personally believe in the power of in-person relationships and the reasoning behind my logic will be provided in the following paragraphs.
In-person communication has several advantages in our personal and business relationships. Firstly, written measures have limited capabilities in transferring emotions and opinions. For instance, some demographics, such as the people with low levels of literacy, children or foreign workers, have a low ability to convey their thoughts, making the written practice more challenging in many cases. However, in face to face relation, people could transfer their opinions with more flexibility by using physical gestures and body language. The likelihood of misunderstanding and conflict between parties is also higher in written styles due to the generational and cultural differences. On the other hand, in face to face version, people could read each other's non-verbal reactions, such as hesitation, tone, joy or anger.
Admittedly, modern life has changes personal life and worldwide economy drastically and it is not possible to solely rely on face to face relationships anymore. In many cases, such as international firms or families who live apart, written communication is the only option available for a daily relationship. However, in the matter of powerfulness, the written relationship has various flaws and downsides.
In conclusion, while it is undeniable facts that society needs written communication in the modern world, the strength and advantages of face to face relationships still outweigh its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e provided in the following paragraphs. In-person communication has several adva...
^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs written" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'written' or 'to be written'.
Suggestion: written; to be written
... is undeniable facts that society needs written communication in the modern world, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 195, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tionships still outweigh its drawbacks.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in many cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71875 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2985754464 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609375 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.0958407884 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243585135905 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857762020589 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580199297087 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147656585073 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373121848103 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.