# Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valueable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, with the advent of the computer and the Internet, sharing of information has become a debatable issue. Some faction of society is advocating the idea of letting the free availability of data. Whereas, there are others who (argue against) oppose this contention. This essay, however, delves into both these aspects individually before (ere) a logical conclusion is arrived at.
On the one hand, it is irrefutable that several severe problems are looming large over humanity. Every nation of the world has to work together and share knowledge, technology and information, to address these global threats such as global warming, scarcity of resources, shortage of energy and many more. For example, stubble burning is a major concern these days from air pollution point of concern, all countries of the global earth must come forward and share their knowledge so that some panacea can be derived to resolve this menace. Ergo, imposing a restriction on the free availability of information is unjustified.
On the other hand, there is another school of thought, who raises their concern against such a move. Moreover, this view is born out of the fact that some antisocial elements might use this unchecked knowledge for the destructive purpose. To cite an example, nuclear energy, which is a boon for humanity, can be applied for preparing a nuclear bomb, weapons of mass destruction. To strike the right balance between these two opposing ideas, it is wise to restrict the highly sensitive and dangerous information, whereas less sensitive data must be placed in the reach of all.
A close scrutiny of the various aspects of the subject in question leads to the contention that it is an evident fact that information is vital for the progress of humanity. But, the information in the hands of indeligent person is precarious. So, it is rational to segregate highly sensitive and confidential data from the other data, which is to be placed in the public domain.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... letting the free availability of data. Whereas, there are others who argue against opp...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'scrutiny'.
Suggestion: scrutiny
... must be placed in the reach of all. A close scrutiny of the various aspects of the subject i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, as to, for example, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77103949524 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577160493827 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9090728781 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.8 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166636653248 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514494253295 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289377290765 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100689331558 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260254699804 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.