Some people believe that parents should limit their children hours of watching tv and playing computer games but encourage to read books Do you agree or disagree

In recent times, playing games on computer or mobile and watching television shows has been increased significantly amongs children. A group of people argued that their guardians should restrict them and push them to read books whils others do not. If questioned, on balance, I firmly agree to the experts who promote reading as a substitute.

Limiting the amount of time to play video games and television shows, by their parents is tremendously beneficial for the child. One of the chief benefits is that they can improve their language skills. The reading materials, including novels, books, newspapers, are containing a high level of grammar and good vocabulary. This will help the readers to broader their horizons and it would be helpful in academics as well.

Furthermore, it is hugely advantageous for their health to read any book. Reading is to give pleasure and a sense of satisfaction, this helps to control blood pressure and individual feel relaxed. The research carried out by a renowned news channel, found that 30 minutes of reading lower the heartbeats and feeling of psychological distress just as effectively as yoga and meditation did.

However, we should not ignore the potential positives of computer games and tv series. To begin with, they develops many skills like team work, problem solving abilities and many more, by playing games. There are plenty of games are available to play with mates and have to apply strategies to do in-game tasks. Above all, majority of them are free to play.

In conclusion, although playing games and watching tv shows has few gains such as team work and problem solving skills, it is necessary to set time period for it. The reading book is more suitable substitute of this because it develops great command on language as well as they become healthier.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s, including novels, books, newspapers, are containing a high level of grammar and good vocabu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'develop'
Suggestion: develop
...ames and tv series. To begin with, they develops many skills like team work, problem sol...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06312292359 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69918783138 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627906976744 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3719885044 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323836996093 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898629839631 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0590903064401 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160384044353 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674944910843 0.056905535591 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.