Some people believe that social networking sites are not doing enough to protect users privacy However others believe that it is not the responsibility of the sites instead users should be more careful about what they make available online Discuss both th

Essay topics:

Some people believe that social networking sites are not doing enough to protect users' privacy. However, others believe that it is not the responsibility of the sites; instead, users should be more careful about what they make available online.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

There are many social websites which allows the user to share their present status and profile of a person. Many people have a perception that these social networking sites are not having protection and their data is being misused whereas few think that private settings are the responsibility of a networking site. Therefore, it is also fault of the user because, people should enable all the private settings available for a site. I think both the arguments are correct and in my view the technology has drastic development so, how much safely they may keep their account hackers are able to hack one's profile and use their data and photos in a wrong way.

Firstly, youth are getting attracted towards the new innovated websites through which they can make plethora of friends. Secondly, people are sharing both their happiness and sorrow and even photos. Moreover, whatever happens in one life they are keeping on internet. Indirectly, they are giving a chance to others to know completely about them.

Basically, networking sites will take all their major precautions while initiating a site to get used by people. At the same time, individuals must be careful while using the site. Here, they should check all the settings like whether, the information they are sharing can be used by others or not. In such cases they should disable their data for others. For example, if you are sharing your pictures then you should not give permission to others to edit your photos.

After having considered all the above discussed points, we can finally draw a conclusion that masses should take care of their profiles as others should not misuse their data. Though the sites are responsible for privacy, users are also answerable for other’s mistakes.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'faulted'.
Suggestion: faulted
... networking site. Therefore, it is also fault of the user because, people should enab...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 643, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s profile and use their data and photos in a wrong way. Firstly, youth are getting attrac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 659, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e their data and photos in a wrong way. Firstly, youth are getting attracted tow...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o others to know completely about them. Basically, networking sites will take al...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, for example, i think, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03082191781 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.482012131 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592465753425 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5368130621 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9333333333 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275987974948 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951622845388 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542447323305 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166899123084 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0385346962659 0.056905535591 68% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.