Recently, many teenagers are indulging in social activities. Although some feel that they should not waste their time doing unpaid work, I believe that it is beneficial for both youngsters and society for three main reasons.
Firstly, children often get team building traits by participating in social work. Many schools sometimes organize outdoor games to develop team building characteristics in children. However, they can learn these skills by doing social work as many activities require the involvement of several people. For example, in many international schools, the importance of team can be taught to children by organizing football and cricket matches, whereas children can inculcate the same either by cleaning the parks with their friends or by planting the trees. Hence, adolescents can learn team building skills by doing free work for society.
Secondly, at an individual level, children may be able to learn how to deal with different people by doing unpaid work. For instance, in voluntary educational activities, youngsters generally interact with the diversity of people and convince them to send their children to schools. As a result, not only do youngsters get confidence to interact with people, but their verbal skills also might get improved.
The final and most beneficial reason why teenagers must do some voluntary work is that it will give them an opportunity to work for the nation, which will give them a sense of fulfillment and satisfaction. A good illustration of this is the voluntary teaching classes in India, where many youngsters teach destitute in the park free of cost. Not only does it gives satisfaction to the teachers, but it also strengthens their academic and teaching skills.
In conclusion, not only does voluntary work boost the confidence of youngsters, but it also gives them satisfaction. Therefore, I believe that it is a positive development to allow children to do unpaid work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
...the trees. Hence, adolescents can learn team building skills by doing free work for ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... skills by doing free work for society. Secondly, at an individual level, childr...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... verbal skills also might get improved. The final and most beneficial reason why...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'?
Suggestion: give
...the park free of cost. Not only does it gives satisfaction to the teachers, but it al...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 360, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'give'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: give
...the park free of cost. Not only does it gives satisfaction to the teachers, but it al...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...also gives them satisfaction. Therefore, I believe that it is a positive developm...
^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt to allow children to do unpaid work.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31067961165 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90981526099 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527508090615 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3044051361 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263465265331 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912543249185 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627427425484 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154100347187 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413113289382 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.