Some people believe that there should be a fixed punishment for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.
Discuss both of these two views and give your own opinion.
Over the last decade, a notable debate has been observed in worldwide over the punishment against crimes. Some believe that it should be predetermined for each type of crime. Whereas, some refute this statement and proclaims that the punishment type should be decided on a case to case basis. Both points of views will be analyzed before drawing any conclusion.
On the one hand, it is logical to believe that each type of crime has certain intensity in the eyes of people, government and Law. For which, the punishment should be predetermined. For Instance, a murderer is always subjected to capital punishment in Pakistan, which is “to be hanged till death”. Ultimately, the criminals would be scared and may consider punishment in their mind before committing such heinous crime. Resultantly, it would be easier for government and law enforcement agencies to control crime and law order situation in the country.
On the other hand, people’s expectation is always high from the justice system of any country in the world to scrutinize the exact reason and circumstances of crime before giving judgment. Furthermore, they are hundreds of criminal cases, which, can be witnessed, where, the convict either committed the crime due to injustice of police or under the exorbitant pressure of society. Obviously, for such cases the punishment cannot be fixed. For example, Pakistan is the best instance for such cases due the weaker judicial system. Moreover, there are certain crimes which are committed due to the lack of awareness, due to poverty as well as in self defense. So such crimes can never be treated in the same way.
In a nutshell, in order to curtail crimes in society, the government should fix the punishments for certain crimes so that people may rethink before committing them. Nevertheless, there has to be a mechanism to delve into the circumstances and motivation of crime in order to eradicate it from the roots.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, whereas, as to, for example, for instance, as well as, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87222012344 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521875 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7588547638 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4705882353 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8235294118 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.29411764706 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478529602638 0.244688304435 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169007918905 0.084324248473 200% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112419879431 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31456086922 0.151304729494 208% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0500566568757 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.