Some people believe that universities should only accept students with high marks. Others think that students of all ages and ability levels should be able to attend universities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, while education has a vital role in the society, there is a controversial debate regarding whether universities should accept only top talented ones or widen their demographic of students. The reasoning behind both perspectives will be discussed in this essay, and I will state my perspective in the conclusion.
There are several convincing reasons why restrictions on admitted students into universities are reasonable. Firstly, there are a lot of jobs which do not require any university certificate, and society will have big challenges if major of youngsters opt to go to university instead of learning a profession practically. Authorities in Iran, as an example, face a big proportion of unemployed university graduates due to the high ratio of young people with university degrees. Secondly, educations these days is not cheap, and governments allocate substantial funds to support educational systems, so this investment should be spent wisely by not risking on accepting every applicant.
However, critics mentioned that only accepting high-mark students into universities is not a logical practice. They mentioned that society will confront severe challenges if there are only limited graduates. Not only firms should pay high salaries to graduates, but also there might be a need to motivate foreign graduates into the countries to fulfill jobs. More importantly, there are other factors besides high-marks, such as hard-working and persistence, which contribute to one's success. There are many instances, that people in unusual ages or ability, become successful in their fields.
In conclusion, I believe that it seems simplistic that university should be limited to only top-marked students, and people with different ages and potential should be allowed to enter universities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 481, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ng and persistence, which contribute to ones success. There are many instances, that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64835164835 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15524340148 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630036630037 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2729227757 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.25 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310985989158 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101952613648 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680159176174 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191287753819 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620563350233 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.