It is a commonly held belief that unpaid community works should be compulsory in high schools. However, some assert that there are a number of benefits in this trend, I completely believe that it ought not to be a part of school programs to the following reasons.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that a school is a place for training children. Its chief aim is to prepare students to be a well-educated person from job skills to ethical values for the forthcoming society. Simply put, tend to do unpaid works for communities could be part of students' training that is better to initiate by schools. A good illustration of this is some specific private institutions in different parts of the world that educate moral values as a crucial subject to students. That is to say, learning ethical values and the companionship along with other academic courses such as geometric and mathematics, students feel more responsible in order to help their surrounding people.
Yet another compelling argument is that compulsory activity may kill motives in children. To put it differently, the more children are forced to do specific work, the more they avoid it. Take Muslim schools where have some compulsory programs as an example. Students in these schools should pray every day and participate in a compulsory religious ceremony which is held from time to time. These initiatives make children uninterested and could adversely affect their beliefs.
In conclusion, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that schools should just be a place to educate children. Furthermore, unpaid community works are completely personal decision which returns to once training who have obtained from the school or even family.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, well, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1637630662 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89727906545 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560975609756 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9003760835 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.857142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30065241674 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102716494515 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662037441723 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188040320264 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521698701324 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.