Some people feel that entertainers (e.g film stars, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money. Do you agree or disagree? Which other types of job should be highly paid?
Nowadays people are getting more attracted towards film stars and different kinds of entertainers as they earn more money have a luxurious life. Some individuals think entertainers are paid too high whereas few people think there are many other professions which has to be paid more. In my view, both arguments have its own benefits depending on their work. I agree with this argument and give my reasons in the following passage.
On the one hand, entertainers are encouraged with high wages based on their talent. However, if there are no skills in them no one will be paid with good amount. In recent days, youth are getting motivated to different arts by knowing about the income earned by them and by seeing the facilities they are enjoying. Accordingly, to gain a good name in the entertaining feild, one has to do more hard work to get recognition in the society. Therefore, paying more for singers, sports stars and so on is not at all waste.
On the other hand, there are many other kinds of works which can have high salaries or high payments. Firstly, in many industries people have to work with heavy machineries which require much effort of human. Secondly, even the senior workers who have kept their whole working service to their company are being paid with low amounts. Hence, masses working in these conditions can be paid higher money as they worth for it.
After having considered all the above discussed points, we finally draw a conclusion that every profession has its greatness in paying high amount. Even we should not underestimate entertainers as they have good talent. At the same time, other hard working professions must also be paid more.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...paid higher money as they worth for it. After having considered all the above di...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, finally, first, firstly, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, as to, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86363636364 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54786685432 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56993006993 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.4347132439 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.9375 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270816647707 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855424130095 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712145895622 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164020931253 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611288624853 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.