Some people feel that with the rise of artificial intelligence, computers and robots will take over the roles of teachers. Do you agree or not?
Without any doubt, society has divided into two groups as per the distinct mind set of desperate people. Therefore, this has become a debatable issue whether, the teachers will be replaced by robots in future. This essay will not only shed light both perceptions but also my point of view will be elaborated in conclusion.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad things to be shared in its favor. First of all, in recent years, robots plays an important part in every sector of human life. Artificial intelligence have been made a vast changes in current edge. Many people has become jobless due to the replacement of advancement. The second point, this has shown innovation a very success in diagnosing disease, in medication and also in doing operations which made medically useful. To exemplify, the innovation of car without a driver is likely to be our hand in future.
As a consequence, these changes of development may also taken by robots instead of teachers can be predicted.
Moving towards the second argument of this debate, the first point is interactive method of teaching will affect the children in both physically and mentally. The interaction between humans cannot be possible by robots. Since, robots are specific to only some interaction, the sense of affection between teachers and students cannot achieve in class room.
Apart from this, inspict of, require knowledge about any topics computers cannot recognize how much students thorough about the subjects there would not be output for the children instead of input. Its result students will likely to behave in different ways interaction is like an algorithm rather than human emotions.
To recapitulate, I concede that, despite of changes in technology is indispensable, replacing teaches is not advisable as per my perceptive.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...the teachers will be replaced by robots in future. This essay will not only shed light bo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...thout a driver is likely to be our hand in future. As a consequence, these changes of de...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of development may also taken by robots instead of teachers can be predicted. M...
^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...y topics computers cannot recognize how much students thorough about the subjects th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ways'' or 'way's'?
Suggestion: ways'; way's
...ents will likely to behave in different ways interaction is like an algorithm rather...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, apart from, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18305084746 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78008678013 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613559322034 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8394314094 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140806035476 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428776761792 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365682774316 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627967771208 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340504012062 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...the teachers will be replaced by robots in future. This essay will not only shed light bo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 552, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...thout a driver is likely to be our hand in future. As a consequence, these changes of de...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 72, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of development may also taken by robots instead of teachers can be predicted. M...
^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...y topics computers cannot recognize how much students thorough about the subjects th...
^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ways'' or 'way's'?
Suggestion: ways'; way's
...ents will likely to behave in different ways interaction is like an algorithm rather...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, apart from, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18305084746 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78008678013 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613559322034 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8394314094 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5625 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5625 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140806035476 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428776761792 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365682774316 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0627967771208 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340504012062 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.