In many countries, academic education is closely tied to students' financial condition. Accordingly, it is argued that universities should provide a special arrangement for those who can not afford their tuition and I agree with this statement.
Above all, there are many students in the world with high potential in science and technology who have to stop studying because they are poor. For example, many parents unwillingly decided to dose not allow their children to go to college because they cannot pay educational tuition fees and other expenses like books, materials which some subjects required or for college campuses.
Apart from tuition, all big and well-known university is located in big cities. Students from rural areas in the country, for instance, have to apply for university in order cities which means they spend a long time traveling between their home and college. So that it could be another reason for the university officials to help those pupils to stay at college dormitory for free.
Last but not least, equal educational opportunity is necessary for all students. Obviously, academic organizations can provide the best way that all interest and talented young people could be studying in the academic filed. As an illustration, universities could give them a full scholarship to cover the costs. In addition, students from rural areas provide a transportation system or low fee accommodation for their study period.
In conclusion, I believe that governments should help universities to make study easier for all needy people, also it could leading factors to improve the educational system in society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ier for all needy people, also it could leading factors to improve the educational syst...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33976833977 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86427680797 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606177606178 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3450689677 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5833333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181950674848 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679273085644 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383790736357 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102424096342 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383429310021 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.