Some people prefer one-on-one lessons, while others prefer groups. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Over the last few years, the way of teaching methods has changed drastically in the field of education. There are many people who think learning in groups enhance the student horizons, whereas other argue on opposite notion. Well, I firmly believe the farmer one has more benefits than the later.
To begin with, many universities and other educational institutions use the model of group learning for number of good reasons. Firstly, during group learning, students learn how to communicate and mingle among other peers with which they tend to overcome their fear and anxiety issues. For example, a child who is been home schooling individually could not face the world normally and hence this would affect their overall development. In contrast, if there is no one-to-one teaching, children would be more confident to speak in public and can lead any kind of life challenges independently.
However, on the other hand, when comparing with group lessons, one-on-one lessons is quite difficult to learn for the students all alone. For instance, it would be impossible to learn dancing without another partner or people around. Moreover, this kind of teaching will eat up the tutors whole precious time as he would be helping only one pupil, especially when there is short of teaching faculty.
In conclusion, despite the benefits from individualised attention and feedback of the mentor, clearly, I see that group learning have highest priority as it gives more room for free exchange of ideas among the students which will help them build their horizons of knowledge. All in all, learning is always fun when it is done in groups!
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 185, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to dance'.
Suggestion: to dance
...stance, it would be impossible to learn dancing without another partner or people aroun...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to have'
Suggestion: to have
...tor, clearly, I see that group learning have highest priority as it gives more room ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 130, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the highest'.
Suggestion: have the highest
...tor, clearly, I see that group learning have highest priority as it gives more room for free...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, so, well, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12686567164 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63621977679 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652985074627 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1308656892 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.4166666667 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172426971369 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649869853856 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554687603333 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10675246531 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369847215496 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.