Some people say the government should spend money on providing faster public transport while others believe the government should give priority to other factors such as cost and the effect on the environment. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
While there are people who think that speed of public transportation should be the top factor in government-backed development, other people, including me, critic this idea and believe that factors, such as cost or influence on the environment, are more important issues. I will elaborate on my reasoning to disagree with this idea in the following paragraphs.
There are more important issues besides the speed of vehicles, which should be considered in the development of public transportations. In terms of cost, demographics of public transports users, such as employees or university students, are sensitive to a sharp increase in prices. Thus, if a new development leads to a high jump in the cost of the metro or bus, users might consider using their personal vehicles, which means more traffics and emission of carbon dioxide. From an environmental perspective, most modern cities already have established infrastructures with little space for new projects. Thus, new plans replace current outdated structures, leading to a huge amount of wastes. As developing countries have already issues with waste management due to the high amount of consumption, they cannot absorb huge amounts of waste to the new projects easily. Therefore, governments should consider the environmental consequences of a new project before ahead.
However, there are indeed merits with having faster buses and metros. Daily commuters would save a lot of time by faster transits and could spend their saved time on either works or family, which in both cases increases people's utility of life. However, adverse side effects of this plan stop implementing this project without considering other factors.
In conclusion, I think speed is an important factor in the development of public transportation; however, we should take into the account other major and more important criteria, such as cost and the effect on the environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is idea in the following paragraphs. There are more important issues besides ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ences of a new project before ahead. However, there are indeed merits with ha...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t without considering other factors. In conclusion, I think speed is an impor...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43666666667 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07986291181 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8864747187 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.461538462 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29210223778 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958783287993 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854906254185 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190467887645 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0830573324114 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.