Some people say that historical buildings should be knocked down, while others believe that they should be preserved and restored instead. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a controversial question in modern cities about dealing with historical places: should they be knocked down or renovated and preserved instead. This essay believes that authorities should keep these places due to their cultural values, and views behind both perspectives will be discussed in this essay.
Modern constructors support the idea of replacing old buildings due to several reasons. In the term of efficiency, modern apartments not only could save energy due to sophisticated materials and technologies, but also, they would let more people live in high-rise apartments, which could help real estate market to meet the high demands of new residents. The high maintenance cost of old buildings is also a considerable factor. If governments decide to conserve a historic building as it is, they should allocate substantial funds to renovate and solving problems due to an outdated structure.
However, critics often highlight the importance of historical buildings for their cultural values. Most of these buildings, with their detailed designs and historical story, could provoke the sense of identity and nostalgia in observants, yet inhabitants of modern cities, would not feel the same way with all tall emotion-less buildings. Furthermore, despite a high-cost of conservation, these building attracts tourists from all around the world, leading to a profitable scheme for local authorities. For example, millions of tourists visit historical places of cities, such as Rome, London, or Istanbul, and make conservation plan sensible for local governments.
In conclusion, although replacing an old building with new constructions could save us money, we should take aside material consideration and consider the cultural values of these places.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 667, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on plan sensible for local governments. In conclusion, although replacing an old...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the cultural values of these places.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68913857678 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05267111511 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644194756554 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4427597125 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.090909091 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209471124551 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801507697592 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0841795457623 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134387102495 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116415744338 0.056905535591 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.