There is a commonly held belief that a person's clothes give information about their character and culture. I completely believe that clothes and appearance could not introduce a person owing to the following reasons.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that there are different factors in choosing a particular form of clothes by people. One of the most important of them is money and financial issues. Simply put, countless people could not wear their favorite clothes cannot afford to purchase them. Take some laborers who suffer from financial problems and cannot buy suitable dress for themselves and their family as an example. Some of these workers are extremely polite, literate, and knowledgeable that no one could find out these kinds of positive attitudes just by looking at their clothes.
Another compelling argument is that the rules and traditions of an area affect its people's clothes. That is to say, in some countries, people are not allowed to wear everything that they like and they should put on in an appropriate way. A good illustration is Islamic countries such as Iran that women must have Hijab and put a scarf everywhere even in summer. These women may not be religious or like what they wear but nobody usually can understand this fact due to their dresses. To put it differently, people's clothes should not be against the rules, costumes, and culture of a society, however, against their character.
To sum up, considering the points discussed above the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that clothes of people could not illustrate their personality and culture. This is mainly because there are a number of factors from money to rules of an area influence on their style.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
There is a commonly held belief that a persons clothes give information about their ch...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...g that they like and they should put on in an appropriate way. A good illustration is Islamic countri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, such as, to begin with, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01742160279 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68105278682 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6060642159 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.857142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234647192898 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771778193598 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569950844257 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147235062163 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336362413367 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.