Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, music has become popular worldwide among all generations to the extent, that some think that it could be used as a mutual interest to bring people closer to each other beyond the border and age differences. I agree with this statement and the reasons behind my logic will be provided in this essay.
Art Advocates believe that music is a powerful source, that could connect people with each other for various reasons. Firstly, the music of each country reflects the historical and cultural values of that nation. For instance, while Latin songs could perfectly show the lifestyle and mindset of people in South-America, traditional Persian music demonstrates the old history of the country, which is filled with searching for spiritual meaning for life and the world. Thus, that's why international tourists are eager to listen to local musicians due to its powerful informativeness. Secondly, the collaboration of music bands from different cultures could also make mutual interests for individuals, beyond personal or national beliefs. This would be helpful with ever-growing local and international tensions, that been raised due to the political and economic agenda of governments. If musicians from different countries collaborate with each other, they could demonstrate intercultural similarities of different countries and encourage people to search for intimacy and closeness.
Admittedly, not all genres of music are beneficial for society to connect people together. There are bands around the world with political, unsocial or even violent manifests. This kind of music not only helps to bring people together but also could raise tension and challenges among different groups. However, the number of these groups is not a lot and they have not gotten enough attention from society due to their harmful content.
In conclusion, although there are some music bands with harmful content, we should not neglect the invaluable power of music in order to close people together.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 475, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...l meaning for life and the world. Thus, thats why international tourists are eager to...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1694.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44694533762 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83215317265 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578778135048 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.497268529 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2142857143 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280164633716 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098681733963 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618485688498 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188252662263 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0221779796753 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.