Some people think that children should not watch television ,while others argue that it help children, Discuss bot views and give your opininion
Children are the future investment of an economy of any country. Their growth is the tool to greater successes that will happen in the world in coming years. In fact, their mind is a creative workshop so the things they learn, the experience gathered by them in any way possible is worth it. one of the best mediums to acquire quick knowledge about the surroundings is television. Some might think watching the idiot box is a waste of time and effort while others believe this to be a fruitful for the young ones mind. I will discuss and analyze both theories.
Electronic Media is a great path to reach the fountain of worldly current affairs and past historical events in a single place. Nowadays there are so many channels for everything like news, history, politics, education, music, dance just to name a few. Moreover, it helps a child to absorb more than reading a single textbook about a particular topic. In addition make him more conscious and encourages him/her in visualising what they want in life. Toddlers has a great sense of vision which if utilised properly can help them shape their future choice at an early age as it will help them in deciding whether they want to become an engineer, doctor, astronaut, teacher, policemen and so many possibilities seems to be open to them. Secondly, they will learn to socialize in the society and become a better citizen for their homeland. Last but not the least they will understand the pros and cons of a situation and how to deal with it.
I know parents will say kids like watching cartoons rather than news and knowledgeable stuff. Brains of our future will be effected and influenced in a bad way as the movies and cinemas they watch destroys the positive mindset of the naive if they visualised a wrong idol they will try to act like him thinking it to be cool and in spite of all this might effect their studies in a negative way.
To conclude this everything has their good and worst but television is still a far better and stronger medium of education and knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 356, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...e textbook about a particular topic. In addition make him more conscious and encourages ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 494, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...dlers has a great sense of vision which if utilised properly can help them shape t...
^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... future will be effected and influenced in a bad way as the movies and cinemas they watch de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 357, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... be cool and in spite of all this might effect their studies in a negative way. To c...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a negative way" with adverb for "negative"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... of all this might effect their studies in a negative way. To conclude this everything has thei...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, while, in addition, in fact, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64819944598 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53288619274 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595567867036 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6401034428 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.875 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0895247889499 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286998738412 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040237610807 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0551950043792 0.151304729494 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387420445904 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 50.2224549098 132% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.