Some people think that countries should limit the amount of food that they import and mainly eat products from their own country.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Since bygone era, consuming local food items and limiting the use of imported food items has always been a matter of debate. In my opinion, we live in the world of globalization, where people should not limit their usage to local items. It makes no sense to restrict import on foodstuffs and compel people to rely on whatever grows in the country.
The foremost reason I believe for allowing the import is to help the country’s population with the varieties across the world. Unequivocally, every fruit cannot be reaped in one’s country, resulting in need to import the item from other part where it grows. In this case, it would be sheer ignorance to ban the product coming in the country. For instance, a kiwi fruit is well-known for its nutritional values to stabilize the white blood cell count and is highly recommended by medical experts during dengue fever. Although it is not grown in India, it does not mean that fruit should not be consumed by Indians because it is not local.
Secondly, it would be narrow mindedness if the import of edibles is restricted because exchanging them is a way to learn lifestyle, culture and tradition outside the country. Undeniable, many people find pleasure sharing their cuisines with friends and relatives abroad. In such circumstances, it is not amiable gesture to stick to just local eatables. An Italian pizza is best example, where people have known Italy by overwhelmingly embracing the pizza and its ingredients from Italy. It is no doubt that people outside Italy started knowing about the country of Pope through delicious pizza.
Although some people argue saying that allowing the foreign fruits and vegetables in the country ruins the agricultural practises in the country as for them people would not buy the local items. However, the reason for sales is always the quality which the consumer thinks before purchasing. Definitely, in such scenario to compete in market, the commodity would be improved to sustain in market, which is again beneficial to the citizens.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that import of any food commodity should not be restricted because it is advantageous for the country’s people. As a result of importing, they have an opportunity to taste and enjoy the nutritional benefits of foreign food products along with embracing their culture and tradition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'is the best'.
Suggestion: is the best
...o just local eatables. An Italian pizza is best example, where people have known Italy ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, well, as for, for instance, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 389.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13367609254 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78910475701 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539845758355 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.1140425421 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.944444444 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21779388568 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642211967525 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396053331521 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123791613834 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038748218233 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.