When international communities help those developing countries, some people think we should attach more importance on financial support. While the others presume the supply of some useful help and instructions should be given more attention, and I believe that both of these two types of measures play equal role of improvement.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why financial subsidies play vital roles in helping those nations and areas in the need of sustainable promotion. Firstly, to initiate the public projects on building and improving fundamental infrastructures demands a great amount of money, which sometimes government budgets can not sustain. It’s obvious the financial sponsors from overseas can help to mitigate the severe challenges deterring the construction of local authorities. For example, an improved transport system can boost exchange of resources as well as labor, and hospitals are crucial for increasing life expectancy and reducing death rate. As a result of more security and convenience, there’s no doubt that not only can national economy see a prosperous increase, but also the quality of life.
On the other hand, I think we should not neglect the promising contribution from other factors could be made. Comparing to any other kind of aids, the importance of education can’t be emphasized too much. If the majority of people did not dedicate themselves into academic study or skills learning, the countries by no means would have seen any long-term development. To cultivate the sense of responsibility and to be aware one’s obligation socially and personally, it’s vital to improve the performance relevant to education. In addition, according to equal rights movement in developed countries, people, especially females, could realize both genders in a society share equal rights and intelligence.
In conclusion, no matter we offer help to developing countries financially or practically, neither of them should be dismissed as less important.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, well, while, for example, i think, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1719.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58116883117 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09304159493 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.8333301521 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 132.230769231 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.2307692308 7.06120827912 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186933697498 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645925643923 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068216350996 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118818033077 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572242310354 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.