Twenty-first century has been witnessing a sea increase in environmental problems which is concerning to large extent not only for dwellers but also governments are suffering from these. It is claimed by a host of individuals that issues with regard to atmosphere need to taken into consideration globally. While, others including me hold an opine that betterment can only be seen if these problems sorted out itself by a country. Both the aspects will be discussed in forthcoming paragraphs before reaching to conclusion.
It is noteworthy to mention that the view of problems regarding environment should look on a worldwide basis has taken great support from people owing to certain factors. The pivotal reason among all these is that combine efforts of governments and people from distinct nationalities would pave the ways to eradicate environmental issues completely as a Unity of Nations will make it happen earlier than utilising a large amount of time by single country to get normalcy in scenario. For example, in 2011, a law was introduced that in future if there will be any sort of atmosphere distress increase, all nations will have to come together by considering it their responsibility towards our precious living space. Hence, it can be said that it would be less time consuming for all countries to sort out environmental problems.
On the other hand, a group of people thought that every Nation must fought out themselves against the environmental issues due to some factors. The main reason behind this is that sometimes it becomes tougher for a particular country to come forward in case of solving atmosphere problems owing to already having superior laws and funds for these desperate situations. Fortunately, it will not be necessitate for particular Nation to engage with others. For instance, the environmental issues have eliminated by Australia itself because of having appropriate environmentalists and funds for problems. Therefore, it is enough to clear that how a country can simply overcome from difficulties related to atmosphere without any influence from other nationalities.
In conclusion, both the paragraphs have highlighted that combine approaches will prove benevolent for ruling out difficulties associated with environment. Nonetheless, particular country cannot imagine fruitful result without dealing with issues on its own basis. Thus, doing efforts nationally would be more tremendous.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 89, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ncrease in environmental problems which is concerning to large extent not only for dwellers b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[5]
Message: Did you mean 'take'?
Suggestion: take
...ssues with regard to atmosphere need to taken into consideration globally. While, oth...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 340, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...obally. While, others including me hold an opine that betterment can only be seen if the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o sort out environmental problems. On the other hand, a group of people tho...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, nonetheless, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, sort of, with regard to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2069.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45910290237 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10847506333 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569920844327 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9344411455 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.3125 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6875 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.625 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209096375416 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723857071305 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368582942354 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133100345896 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160790292742 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.