Some people think that a good way to reduce crime is longer sentences. others may think there are alternatives for this problem
discuss both vews and give ur opinion
It has been seen in many parts of the world the crime rate is elevating daily as a result many people are becoming victims of crime. This is because; the attackers are often illiterate or do not have parental guidance. A portion of people state that the best solution to shun this issue is to increase the prison span and others cite that there are other possible solutions for this problem. I stand with the experts who think that there are alternatives.
On one hand, people think that if the sentence of the prison is increased it will be a good solution for the problem. As they will spend most of the time in jail on par with the crime they have done, they will be working under jurisdiction and learn to live a normal life after the period. It has been seen in many Indian jails that people who served longer sentences have changed and living a respectful after prison life. The main reason of this change is because, they fear that if they involve in any criminal activities, they will be behind bars again. Thus, people suggest that increasing the span of sentence will cut the crime.
On the contrary, there are factions of experts who believe that there are many other alternatives can mitigate this trouble. For every problem there will be a simple solution, instead of opting for harder approach which make the offender permanently evil, they can be sent to some detention centers where he or she can avail the opportunity of learning about true values and morals, which is easy. Increase of sentence time will take valuable time the person; instead he can send to counseling centers where he can learn ethics. The root cause of this problem is unemployment and parental guidance. If the government provides adequate jobs and caretakers spend a quality time to teach their children about good and bad, they will not look for doing crime. Therefore, these are some of the alternative that can be substituted in the place of increasing span of sentence.
Weighing up both sides of discussion, although increment of term in prison will shun the crime, it will not change the person attitude. The alternatives which were given above will definitely change the behavior and make him a responsible citizen. Hence, I opine that there are several other approaches apart from increasing term in jail to mitigate this plaguing issue.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...they will spend most of the time in jail on par with the crime they have done, th...
^^
Line 6, column 778, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...k for doing crime. Therefore, these are some of the alternative that can be substituted in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, so, therefore, thus, apart from, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 405.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46645039154 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493827160494 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1555341572 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184463626839 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656023633546 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423681560664 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119572649137 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0433521632645 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.