Some people think that keeping pets is good for children while others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options and give examples.
In this day and age, keeping pets have become a status symbol. The debatable topic is that, whether having pets are beneficial or detrimental for younger ones. In my opinion, pets are quite valuable for adolescent’s physical as well as psychological well-being.
On one hand, a pet in child’s life is a great source to learn numerous values which will be helpful in longer run. With pets, children attain sense of responsibility at an early age. They empathize the domestic animals in the time of need and take utmost care of them. Pets befriend with children easily and thus, share a strong bond of love and affection and consequently, this aid in developing social skills at tender age. According to the recent survey by Children welfare team, 39% of teenagers are proactive to make friends during camping. Hence, I certainly agree, that children having pets is a good thing.
On the other hand, few people think that animals in young ones live are always in perilous. Children are vulnerable and posses less immune system as compared to adults. Generally, pets have bacteria as they roam around contaminated places during their routine walks. Therefore, juveniles easily get infected by coming in contact with them and fall prey to hazardous ailments. For instance, Dogs shower their love to the caretakers by touching their body and face and as a result impurities of polluted places affect the owner and make them sick. However, with proper vaccination and precautions such problems can be deterred.
In conclusion, although, people vary in their opinions, I concur that pets are human’s best friend and they equally contribute to the holistic development of children by instilling moral values which will help them to become a responsible citizen of the society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14726027397 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80173616857 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630136986301 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8820092193 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9375 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.9375 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192318634219 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575195085604 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354765441108 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10756732011 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169402492634 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.