Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The way people in the world are connected with each other virtually is all because of a great invention in the field of technology. It has a vital role in bringing humans all over the world together. Thus, people are becoming more social using various social media platforms, but also equally unavailable in person for each other. Here, we will discuss both views.
To begin with, virtual meetings was just a thought in past, which has become reality today. Many platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter help people in many ways. For example, Facebook helps in connecting relatives and friends who are based in different parts of the world. Instagram gives a platform to showcase one's skills. One can make videos, be it motivational, spiritual, cooking shows, acting talent, immigration related material, how to speak effectively and much more. In this way, yes definitely people are becoming more sociable.
On the other side, due to such an advancement,meeting each other on a personal front has reduced drastically which has negative impact. Kids and teenagers are so much involved in games and other social media activities that they do not prefer to meet other closed relatives. Plus, cut throat competitions has made the situations worst. During weekends, instead of doing get together, many prefer to talk through social media which should not be the case ideally. Over use of computers and playing games affect kid's thinking and intellectual ability and ultimately gives an invitation to various disease. Moreover, it creates a gap between family members.
In conclusion, the drawbacks of technology effect on our social behaviour. Meeting your loved ones in person gives immense satisfaction that technology can not do. That is why it is recommended to use technology in a wise way, not at the cost of personal values.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ther. Here, we will discuss both views. To begin with, virtual meetings was just...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...th, virtual meetings was just a thought in past, which has become reality today. Many p...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 318, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
... Instagram gives a platform to showcase ones skills. One can make videos, be it moti...
^^^^
Line 5, column 46, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , meeting
...e other side, due to such an advancement,meeting each other on a personal front has redu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es that they do not prefer to meet other closed relatives. Plus, cut throat compe...
^^
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wise way" with adverb for "wise"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...why it is recommended to use technology in a wise way, not at the cost of personal values.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1744966443 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79658880926 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637583892617 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7341677939 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1578947368 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6842105263 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170786919686 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0450646266245 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0365979132462 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946544230968 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0205993310423 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.