Some people think that newly built houses in the local areas, while others think that people should have the freedom to build houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent years, construction in regional areas has become an issue of broad interest to the general public. Regarding this phenomenon, there is a striking conflict as to whether the architectural design of new dwellings should be based on the standard of current ones or rely on the owners’ hobbies. To the best of my belief, I support those who bear thought that the landlords should be given a chance to construct their domiciles freely.
On the one hand, perhaps the stablest and the strongest argument in the favor of the former view is related to the cultural preservation and traditional legacies since letting owners build their residences spontaneously maybe break detrimentally the standardized architectural plan of local areas. This can be illustrated by countries, especially a number of nations depending heavily on the tourism industry, facilitate foreign travelers to visit these attractions, which will boost the domestic economy. If this phenomenon happens continuously together with mixed, uncontrolled commonplace principles, it will act as a precursor to a consequence that regional zones completely lose aesthetic value. Hence, it is acceptable for possessors to build their dwellings uniformly.
On the other hand, in terms of economic perspective, there is enormous benefits that the government would reap when it comes to construction houses in accordance with landlords’ demands. For the best, the booming of the construction industry not only creates millions of jobs for employees working in this field but also fosters the growth of a variety of other services such as companies producing cement and design firms. Not to mention that the more residences built the more taxes obtained, which means the national budget of states would be complemented to allocate for other public services consisting of education, health care, and infrastructure.
In conclusion, due to the fact that the vast benefits of building houses freely based on owners’ needs outweighed its drawbacks. Therefore, I agree with the majority of people supporting this idea. However, the state should issue suitable policies to encourage landlords of dwellings in accordance with themselves’ hobbies along with maintaining existing surroundings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ecome an issue of broad interest to the general public. Regarding this phenomenon, there is a ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...henomenon, there is a striking conflict as to whether the architectural design of new dwellin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 447, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ce to construct their domiciles freely. On the one hand, perhaps the stablest an...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are enormous benefits'?
Suggestion: there are enormous benefits
...hand, in terms of economic perspective, there is enormous benefits that the government would reap when it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs outweighed" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'outweighing' or 'to be outweighed'.
Suggestion: outweighing; to be outweighed
...uses freely based on owners' needs outweighed its drawbacks. Therefore, I agree with ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, well, as to, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1925.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57971014493 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18750184814 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620289855072 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.7633383192 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.076923077 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5384615385 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114181773028 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038896591302 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305416200061 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637354562644 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171251984615 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.