Some people think that studying history is a waste of time while others think it is essential to learn history.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Histroy is an epic story. It is never-ending debate between two different group of people arguing that studying history is useful or waste of time. History plays a vital role in a traditional oriented society preserving the rich culture and value. In this eassy I would express my opinion on both the views.
Certainly, it is important to learn about history precisely about our ancestors lifestyle. In other words, how did they lived and enjoyed their life when there was no electronic entertainments. How did they constructed the seven wonders which is standing tall against natural calamities. What type of equipment they might have used to predict or forecast the future. For an instance, The Great Wall of China holds its mystery about it is construction method. Archeologists and researchers are still exploring to know the materials used to construct such a strong wall.
On the other hand, history also captures the negative side provoking some violence. To rephrase, the aforementioned example of Great Wall of China, says one of the reason behind the long wall construction it connects between two different dynasties who ruled couple of hundred years ago was majorly to attack the enemies. To cite an example, Mainland China and Hong Kong prevails to have a cold war between them even though they are called as one country. It is not only because of the Ancient revenge but also during British invasion.
In my opinion, It is important to study about the history it gives enormous of life teaching lessons. However, it is essential to eliminate the contradicting side of it. Because, preserving the tradition and cultural values are as important as preserving the earth for the further generation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 75, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...ver-ending debate between two different group of people arguing that studying history...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: DID_PAST[2]
Message: Did you mean 'construct'?
Suggestion: construct
...electronic entertainments. How did they constructed the seven wonders which is standing tal...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09219858156 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80026908822 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631205673759 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4969772994 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4705882353 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167052822377 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502778418287 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067591873331 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105160583999 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623548072814 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.