Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Other say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both the views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well. Other say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects.
Discuss both the views and give your opinion.

It is believed that beliefs are the foundation of one’s behavior and the mere measurement to judge what is right and wrong. Good behavior is either taught by parents or by teachers at school. Taking this into consideration, some people think that it is teachers responsibility to indoctrinate good belief so that they can segregate between good and bad while others say that teachers only focus on academic subjects only. I discussed both the viewpoint logically before my opinion.

Teachers are the role model and ideal for most students. Students consciously or unconsciously adopt the behavior of respective teachers and thus they cultivate a cognitive skill to differentiate between right and wrong. Many ethnicities believe that countering situation and respond to it tactfully is the only skill which can be inherited by learning some logical lessons at school, plus that would help students in the long haul. Hence, some people are more inclined to support the notion that it is teachers responsibility to imply the skill of deciding upon what is right, to behave well. For example, For example, Most of today’s schools in my city started taking good demeanour and proving cognitively abilities lectures and workshops. Surprisingly, they are getting excellent results in term of their students’ success in life and faculties believe that this difference is the only the effect of the aforementioned extra lectures and workshops. However, Some people believe that teachers duty is only to teach academics.

Some technical fraternities believe that it is more important for the students to do well in their academics and therefore teachers should only focus on academic subjects. They believe good behavior and taking the right decision at right time could be taught at by their parents or by the community they are living. Moreover, these professional people also believe that if students failed at academics, they would fail in the overall life, in term of achieving success. So, good judgement and behavior shall not matter in their upcoming life. For instance, one of the school teachers at Sunshine school emphasis more on a person's behavior than their given subject and thus most students are failing in their academics.

To conclude, I firmly believe that if students’ academic is powerful then they would learn the skill to judge well and behave according to their surroundings plus situations. I also support the notion of teachers should only teach regular academic courses because other skill can be inherited by their parents and or by the communities.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 892, Rule ID: THE_EXACTLY_THE[1]
Message: Duplicated 'the' in the phrase: 'the only the'. Did you mean 'only the'?
Suggestion: only the
...culties believe that this difference is the only the effect of the aforementioned extra lect...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 998, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...hops. However, Some people believe that teachers duty is only to teach academics. Som...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...s at Sunshine school emphasis more on a persons behavior than their given subject and t...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2185.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 414.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86633567188 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468599033816 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 672.3 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5763272305 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.388888889 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61111111111 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414197523636 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132450633377 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0792960409397 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.266269030994 0.151304729494 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320993976764 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.