Some people think that wild animals should not be kept in zoos. Others believe that there are good reasons for having zoos.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Holding animals in captivate has sparked a heated debate recently. Although contested by many that the matter of keeping animals in zoos is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly unethical and detrimental by a substantial number of individuals. I have an opposite view of the first group and in this essay, we will discuss both sides of the argument and state my point of view.
The confinement of animals in zoos made them suffer from adverse impacts on their psychology. The good life condition never in any way match with liberty that animal would possess in their wildlife. Additionally, the process of catching the animals to take them to the zoos is unpleasant to animals. Another possible disadvantage of captivating animals might be that their newborns never find the chance to exist in their natural habitat and lead a normal life on their own. As a result, if hypothetically the guards release them, their chance of survival is minimal.
Although, the pros include the protection of animal's right basing on the level of risks they faced in the natural world. They are still hunted down by poachers for many reasons such as meat, ivory or fur, which is awful. Zoos considered as a safe place for animals and they entitled to good surroundings since they are not subject to adversaries like lacking food or water. In addition, zoos play a vital role in education. It means children from schools can visit them and learn about various kind of animals.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the drawbacks of keeping animals in the cage far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the immoral activity, but also deprive them of being in their natural environment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...their chance of survival is minimal. Although, the pros include the protection of ani...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, while, in addition, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9795221843 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68775177393 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621160409556 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7741401192 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143266193876 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424583341999 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328861594794 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835210490484 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017800628412 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.