Some scientist say that the world will be destroyed by human activities very soon to what extent do you agree or disagree.
In the quest of achieving god like superpowers, mankind has been experimenting so many new ideas. Some scientist believes that the days are numbered when the world is destroyed by human activities. I believe in the notion that the planet would be destroyed by some of the scientific tests. Two key factors are the evolution of artificial intelligence and perpetual integration of arc reactor technology.
Many of the scientists nowadays are in confusion that what if something would go wrong, particularly, those who work in the field of artificial intelligence. Researchers know that even a single mistake in programming AI interfaces can put this world safety on a stake. For example, one of the laboratories in Chicago had been trying to implement human language learning capabilities to robots.
Later, they realised that robots had developed their own language to talk with their internal programs which could not be deserialised by any human. This could be the malice activity or ideas by robots to escape from human imprisonment, which in turn destroy all the life form on the earth.
On the other hand, many intelligent minds want to develop infinite energy sources like the sun. In fact, they already succeeded to develop a blueprint of sun like energy which is now known as an Arc Reactor technology. This experiment was done by several international nuclear scientists at the Geneva, Switzerland, after few months they also realised that there was no source to shut down this Arc Reactor as this itself a complete source of energy. After several months, one of the scientists had stated that if the aforementioned energy destabilises then it could have engulfed the whole world like a black hole in the space.
To conclude, I believe that dealing with unknown powers and technologies either bring more abundance in human life or completely destroy all the living orgasm of the earth. So, those were the only two experiments which could have destroyed the world and many other experiments are awaiting, minor mistake in these experiments would put the world at risk.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n that the planet would be destroyed by some of the scientific tests. Two key factors are t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, for example, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10233918129 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87442367797 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9498823276 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.333333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.93333333333 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167947774912 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060578953319 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643425525325 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982368635253 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432841270816 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.