In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Agriculture practice is one of the most important practice as it ensures provisions of food and clothing for the entire mankind. These days there have been numerous changes introduced to agriculture in order to improve the quality and quantity of food production yet, this has not been able to eradicate hunger issues from around the globe. This essay discusses, primary causes and solutions for a prevalence of hunger even though there is up-gradation of agriculture science.
First and foremost cause of insufficient food supply is a result of decreasing popularity if farming as a career choice. Farming these days have less or no monetary incentive as well as it is not always a profitable business. Hence it is observed youth today prefers to migrate to an urban area in search of jobs leaving their traditional agricultural practices behind. Consequently, there are fewer farmers producing food. The second culprit responsible for world hunger is a combination of poor food transportation system for perishables and immense food wastage, particularly in urban areas. Owing to this there is a lack of food supply to underprivileged especially in the developing nations leaving them hungry and malnourished. Therefore there is a dire need to encourage agriculture as well as improve food supply chain, food storage and regulate its wastage.
In order to deal with decreasing number of farmers, the government should not only subsidize costs in farming practices but also introduce more agriculture and horticulture universities and encourage concepts of urban farming. This would ensure an increasing involvement in food production. Moreover, financial compensations in terms of better selling rates would also make it a profitable trade practice. On the other hand, there is a need for better transportation facilities for fruits and vegetables to utilize it completely. Additionally strict laws should be enforced against food wastage and alternatively, creative options such as a distribution of excess food amongst the poor should be made available. Clearly, authorities could play an important role in better food production, supply and storage, and consumption.
Despite the development in agriculture science, there is a food shortage resulting in hunger. This essay outlined three major causes for this. Such as decreasing agriculture practice, improper food supply chin and immense food wastage. However, this could be overcome by active government involvement to increase awareness regarding agriculture and implementing strict rules against food wastage.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...it is not always a profitable business. Hence it is observed youth today prefers to m...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 735, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s leaving them hungry and malnourished. Therefore there is a dire need to encourage agric...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 531, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...nd vegetables to utilize it completely. Additionally strict laws should be enforced against ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, therefore, well, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2189.0 1615.20841683 136% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58418367347 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13191238834 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 703.8 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0046465045 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.45 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11997952147 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042492712055 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430379917685 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0914142760753 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394658906241 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.