Some people believe that learning practical skills, such as maintaining a car or managing one's bank account, should be included in the school curriculum. I do not doubt that living ability is as important as academic performance. However, in my view, those lessons should be optional rather than mandatory.
Firstly, learning how to live in a society is vital. Many people find themselves in trouble after graduating because they didn't gain valuable knowledge at college. For instance, lacking the ability to manage their finance, some people struggle to make ends meet every month, ending up in debt. If they were taught to be economical, they would have a better life.
Furthermore, school is not an escape from reality. In the end, everyone must earn a living in society, which requires social skills as well as problem-solving skills. To tackle issues in the future, individuals need to gain practical experience and increase their independence at school, a place we can get easy access to systematic knowledge.
Regardless of how essential living ability is, making all relevant lessons compulsory is not scientific. Many people can get a deeper understanding of knowledge when encountering problems and cope with them, which could be more efficient. There are also alternatives, such as searching on the Internet and turning to others for help. Our attention is restricted and rare, so students should be allowed to select what they will utilize frequently or what they are interested in to learn.
To sum up, not only should students get academic skills, but they also need practical skills. Both of the skills should be accessible at school. Given the limitations of human attention, it would be preferable to make a wide range of living lessons optional to students.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...n trouble after graduating because they didnt gain valuable knowledge at college. For...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for instance, such as, as well as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18685121107 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8618741048 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626297577855 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2756495375 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1764705882 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184671745846 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584156937663 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721187747111 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111665597217 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827970315869 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...n trouble after graduating because they didnt gain valuable knowledge at college. For...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for instance, such as, as well as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18685121107 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8618741048 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626297577855 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2756495375 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1764705882 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184671745846 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584156937663 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721187747111 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111665597217 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0827970315869 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.