There are many types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important and should it be preserved or is international music that is heard everywhere nowadays more useful to a society?
Ever since the dawn of humanity, music has become an integral part of every human’s life. Invariably, it provides enjoyment to the listener. However, few take pleasure in traditional music, while others treasure international music. In my opinion, any piece of music is important and should be preserved.
The beneficial effects of music, on both the physical and mental health of a person are established by numerous studies in this arena. For instance, music therapy has been successfully used to treat patients with Parkinson’s disease and stroke victims. Furthermore, music is one of the very few activities, which utilizes the entire brain and serves as an exercise to it. Also, it has been firmly established that listening to music while exercising, increases the duration that we spend in workout considerably. Hence, the need of music is indisputable.
Considering that both traditional and international music delight people, one cannot choose between them. Classical music boasts the culture and customs of the civilization they hail from and serves as a bond through generations. For example, many African tribes cherish music which is unique to them. On the other hand, international music transcends the differences among various societies and cultivates a feeling of harmony across the world. This holds true as a musician’s work in the western world can influence a patron in the eastern world.
Briefly, music is indispensable to mankind. Also, I embrace both the singularity of traditional music and the solidarity of international music. They serve humankind in their own way and the growth of one form of music need not be at the expense of the other.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35820895522 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10058237259 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60447761194 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7869203368 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4705882353 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7647058824 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446908533726 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155256402752 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825152642015 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.292946143681 0.151304729494 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338087654477 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.