These days, cell (mobile) phones and the internet are very important to the ways in which people relate to one another socially.
Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
Now a day, mobile phones and online websites plays a vital role in terms of communication with human beings. This development of interaction among humans far outweigh the disadvantages.
The prominent positive advantage is that, it helps to keep families and friends together. This is to say, because of social networking platforms people can keep in touch with far and near ones by a click of a button. To illustrate, a latest survey of guardian magazine disclosed that, since the establishment of internet, only 2% of public exchange hand written letters when compared to past 5 decades. Another major aspect is that, mobiles are user-friendly and most websites are free of cost.
A noticeable negative factor of using these regularly affects students, because of easy access they perform poorer in academics. This means, both husband and wife allow kids to use and carry phones to school, which later becomes a mandatory task to be on social websites recurrently. As a result, they give less importance to academics and ultimately they are awarded with low grades. For instance, after the implementation of phone detectors in every education institute of India, on an average 98% of organization have achieved 100% passing results for the year 2014. The second disadvantage is that, parents mingle into phones immensely that they give less importance to their children and as a result, minors learn from them.
To conclude, no doubt cell phones and worldwide websites are extremely essential in today’s world to communicate with each other. Although, because of this students does not achieve desired grades in academics and adults keep themselves busy in social networking websites, the advantages of being easy to use and raising a happy life by keeping in touch with close one’s far outweigh the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 232, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... by a click of a button. To illustrate, a latest survey of guardian magazine disc...
^
Line 4, column 156, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e with each other. Although, because of this students does not achieve desired grade...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, for instance, no doubt, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22448979592 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89601832104 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639455782313 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1674590811 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.153846154 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198750840533 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621586608155 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313651642917 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108615130392 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107960174907 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.