Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic?
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
These days, it is becoming increasingly common to hear people talk about visiting places with tough situations rather than tourist traps. Indeed, they are eager in going off beaten track such as Sahara Desert or Antarctic with its freezing cold weather. It will have both merits and demerits.
On the one hand, this change of tourist’s notion brings some benefits. The first and for the most, by this change unknown places will be famed. Theses places are secluded and visiting them lead their concealed features be revealed. I am supposing that there are lots of places where have been hidden from human’s eyes that exploring them will definitely help to improve the cognizance of human being from their surround. Besides, tripping to obscure and unfamiliar places with difficult conditions is much more interesting than visiting tourist traps which are tedious. Mostly, going to these struggled places are accompanying by unpredictable and challengeable events that makes them thriller. It would be mentioned that this sort of tripping is more preferable for youth rather than elderly people.
On the flip side, this tendency to harsh places will have also negative sides. Firstly, intact areas will definitely damage once the human gets his foot there. I predict with absolute evidences that these places will lose their virgin feature by human activities. Since people use to put memorabilia from themselves everywhere with paying no attention to how much their actions hurt to environment. Secondly, there are always risks that threaten visitors of difficult places. Due to lack of services and also being close to wildlife, jeopardy is an obvious aspect of this kind of tripping. If people went there without being prepared and aware in advance, they might suffer from serious injuries at last. For instance, I have read a news around snake bits which habitant in deserts that always menace desert enthusiasts.
In conclusion, nowadays people are enthusiastic to be away from ordinate tourist attractive places by visiting places with struggled situations. It has resulted advantages like familiarizing with disrepute places and also have an interesting visit. But its disadvantages such as destroying of intact locations and their risks which threaten well-being of visitors should not be forgotten.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[4]
Message: The verb suppose is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'suppose'
Suggestion: suppose
...their concealed features be revealed. I am supposing that there are lots of places where hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...their concealed features be revealed. I am supposing that there are lots of places where hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eir virgin feature by human activities. Since people use to put memorabilia from them...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ature by human activities. Since people use to put memorabilia from themselves ever...
^^^
Line 3, column 731, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...ries at last. For instance, I have read a news around snake bits which habitant in des...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, sort of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34520547945 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66270644825 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597260273973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2349568719 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9047619048 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.380952381 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09523809524 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280951817413 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772192134953 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698626781775 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179429784181 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678114802707 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.