The trend of increasing tourism causes environmental problems in many parts of the world. What are the main causes of pollution it creates? What can be done to reduce it?
Whilst nowadays the advent of sophisticated innovations in transportations has changed the tourism industry substantially, the adverse side-effect of this phenomenon on the environment is concerning. I will discuss the main origins of the contamination and few suggestions will be recommended in order to mitigate this controversial challenge.
As critics point at several different players, who are responsible for damaging effects of the ever-growing tourism industry, there are two main sources for pollutions. Firstly, recently, the tourism industry tries to attract people by giving them a first-hand observation of the natural habitat of rare breeds. Although these journeys might be exciting, especially for adventurous tourists, the overuse of these trips have adverse impacts on the environment by interfering in the natural ecosystem, which might force the animals or plants to react and change behaviors to adapt to these uninvited guests into their local territories. Secondly, increasing international flights have contributed significantly to the emission of pollutions. While the advance airplanes make long-distance flights convenient, environmentalists mention figures, which demonstrate the extent these flights damaging the atmosphere.
However, there are still some hopes to tackle this issue, if the whole world takes it seriously. First of all, authorities should impose a higher tax on adventure trips into the wildlife. The collected money could not only decrease the amount of interference by decreasing these trips, but also could be used on plans to help local governments to preserve endangered animals. Besides that, there should be a worldwide awareness program to inform individuals about the burden on environments by increasing trips into nature. People should be aware that there would be no nature to enjoy in the future unless they act responsibly regarding the environment.
Taken together, there are two major channels on how the tourism industry affects the earth's environment. However, if we implement conservation programs, for instance by increasing tax on damaging trips, or awareness programs, we could hope that the next generation could enjoy nature as we do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...ism industry substantially, the adverse side-effect of this phenomenon on the environment i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...t of this phenomenon on the environment is concerning. I will discuss the main origins of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 21, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...rsial challenge. As critics point at several different players, who are responsible for damagi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
...on how the tourism industry affects the earths environment. However, if we implement c...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...generation could enjoy nature as we do.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, while, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1887.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75304878049 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21231960562 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4376769612 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.785714286 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0998753617605 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347405137056 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233781565562 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583944100469 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127320290709 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.