The debate over the usage of mobile phones by drivers has not been put to rest. Some people believe that these devices should be forbidden during the motion time. But is this that worthwhile? For me, I firmly agree that the government should impose a strong limitation in this particular case.
To begin with, the major reason for such people's rights restriction is that driving is dangerous under such conditions. This is because drivers often lose concentration when doing both activities simultaneously. In my experience, once in 2010, I was talking by mobile phone and nearly have bumped another car. Had I not used this device, I would never have got in such an awful situation. Moreover, it is generally agreed that electromagnetic emission from any kind of redundant instruments could have an adverse impact on the car's systems. This is due to the fact that modern automobiles are full of electronics which are already installed and work primarily by using wireless technology with similar frequency.
Another reason why limitation should be applied is that driving under such conditions slowers the pace of the transport system in a megapolis. This cause many traffic problems ranging from small jams at the crossroads in the mornings to gargantuan ones near the shopping malls just before holidays like Christmas or New Year. In addition, it appears that it is harder to get to the destination on time due to this kind of driving. Personally, I have stopped using my own car in Moscow since 2012, because the public transport, especially the underground is more convenient for commuting when you do not want to be late.
Having said that, not only are there many dangerous factors of using cell phones by drivers but also there are many advantages of its prohibition, so the government should implement a strict law with such regulations. Not only this would improve the safety on the roads but also this would contribute to the enhancement of the transport situation in megapolises like Moscow.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, so, while, in addition, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03592814371 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7921982969 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604790419162 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9181395292 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.125 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186737485709 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529176425073 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474050247812 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112338750838 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0233601908053 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.