What are the advantages and disadvantages of using CCTV cameras to fight crime?
Nowadays, over the last ten years the number of CCTV cameras has increased dramatically. However, some politicians claim that apart from having a great deal of advantages this growing trend also has many disadvantages. In this essay, I will discuss both pros and cons of this phenomenon and give my opinion.
Let us start by looking at the benefits of CCTV cameras in curbing crime rate. One of the main positives of this is that it usually witnesses the moment of misdeed. This type of cameras can capture the site of wrongdoing so that criminals cannot avoid justice. What I mean by this is that if there are no recorder, they can question the evidence in court and escape penalty. Another major advantage is that it may act as a deterrent. Criminals would think twice before committing a crime and therefore change the mind if they were aware of the inevitability of punishment. After analyzing these benefits, it is clear that CCTV cameras to combat crime is advantageous.
On the other hand, having CCTV cameras in the street has plenty of disadvantages. First of all, it often leads to violation of constitutional rights. In other words, they violate the right to privacy because they are installed in public places and record uninformed citizens, which is unfair. Secondly, it is usually easy to trick this type of device. Take camcorders near banks for example. Experienced offenders can pass the cameras unnoticed around the bank since they know now to exploit the blind spots. As a result, CCTV cameras can become useless in crime elimination, once criminals are conscious of how to deceive them. After considering these drawbacks, it is obvious that using CCTV cameras can be worthless.
All things considered, even though there are plenty of positives in using CCTV cameras in dealing with felony, I think that above-mentioned drawbacks easily overweigh the benefits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'recorders', 'records'?
Suggestion: recorders; records
... I mean by this is that if there are no recorder, they can question the evidence in cour...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, apart from, as to, for example, i mean, i think, as a result, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03514376997 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79718982961 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600638977636 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2448317271 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.9473684211 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4736842105 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42105263158 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286467979508 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789021261105 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729376033634 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159610248504 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509664471403 0.056905535591 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.