When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Advancement in technology is overtaking traditional aspects in work and life in today's world making them outdated. Some people believe that technology should completely replace traditional ways in this fast paced world. This essay will argue why we should not just preserve traditional approaches while we make technology developments but also look at ways of bringing technology and tradition together.
In today's competitive world, people are looking to outpace each other at work as well as in social life. Technology advancements brings automation thus replacing human effort. Hence, technology has made this competition even more fierce as it not just eases the complexity of work but also saves time and money as compared to traditional skills. For instance, lot of businesses making traditional hand woven garments have now replaced humans with machines in an attempt to make their products reach market faster and gain market share. Thus, people think technology is an obvious replacement to traditional skills in today's way of living.
Despite the advantages that technology provides in today's modern life, effort should be made to preserve traditional skills. Infact, preserving traditional skills will also give opportunity to bring tradition and technology together to achieve best of both the worlds. People with traditional and technology skills should come together and collaborate on introducing traditional aspects in technology thus making it a win-win situation for everyone. For example, people having traditional skills understand the nuances of tradition. Traditional knowledge of these people should be used while developing technology. This will not just create great quality products but also help in creating jobs for everyone. Thus, there are large benefits in bringing technology and traditional skills together instead of letting technology replace them completely.
In conclusion, this essay argued that using technology to replace traditional skills is a flawed approach. In my opinion, the traditional skills are niche and those should be used along with technology to bring together best of both the worlds.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67492260062 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89023175537 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520123839009 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6550364275 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.823529412 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161829689478 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0706569425578 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0312867027768 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122551468537 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238267847697 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.