When a country develops its technology, the traditional skills and ways of life die out. It is pointless to try and keep them alive.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Technology is advancing at a rampant speed and humans are trying to catch-up to this change. In the process, people are losing their regular way of living. Whether traditional skills or methods should be done away is a question to ponder. This conundrum is deliberated in the essay below.
New innovations are paving way for introduction of innovative gadgets in people’s life. Also, in olden days, for meeting a friend or a business partner, people used to travel to distant places on horseback. This is revolutionized by introduction of Internet, whereby, people can host webinars and conferences online and meet another person online without wasting energy and money. Many people used to make things by hand, which are now replaced by machinery. To achieve economies of scale and mass produce a commodity, use of machinery is beneficial.
However, there is a flip side; every discovery brings massive change in a way that a society functions. With the internet
people have lost the way they met people before. For example, Chinese are known for century for socializing over tea. The current generation has forgotten their unique age old tradition of communication and is ranked 1 for communication over phone. In past, people prepared food in a traditional manner like following ancestral recipes passing down from generation s like handmade pickles. Nowadays, people make meals using devices like micro ovens and food processors, whereby the nutritional value of food is lost.
Based on the above, it can be concluded that technology may be boon for many but could be curse for few. It depends how traditions and ways of life are being replaced by the technology in human life and sentimental is an individual towards retaining those traditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...d be done away is a question to ponder. this conundrum is deliberated in the essay b...
^^^^
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
...ter introduction of computers for good. In past, for editing a document numerous pages ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: General
...n transmit via internet to the receiver.General public, these days, even read their new...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: Public
...n transmit via internet to the receiver.General public, these days, even read their newspapers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 690, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...eople used to travel to distant places. this is revolutionized by introduction of in...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... without wasting energy and money. however, there is a flip side; every discovery ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Based
...is ranked 1 for their phone usage. based on the above, it can be concluded that ...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...on for many but could be curse for few. it depends how traditions and ways of life...
^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d by the technology in human life.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, as for, for example, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12857142857 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81443074318 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594285714286 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.2100869036 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.4761904762 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90476190476 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904345134959 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0315916931165 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0354218816312 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0673924272363 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294086299547 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.