Technological developments have revolutionised the way people live completely. Majority of people believe that conventional abilities have become obsolete with the introduction of machines which are cutting edge of computer technology. I particially agree with this sentiment since I also would argue that feelings and emotions will be vitally important until human extinction. This essay will discuss both of them deeply.
On the one hand, many skills have become useless after computer programmes and robots have introduced. Being billingual and trilingual are not vitally important in today's world given the fact that there are countless translators which are intuitive are available in the market. In earlier times, speaking and writing in English besides mother tongue was vital to land a job while today many individuals have gadgets which have translator apps which enable them communicate in all languages. Majority of students do not have to learn Maths since there are innumerable computer programmes which compute the most complex calculations in a second. For example, a survey by KAN Job Portal in 2018 revealed that 80% of employers demand engineers who have excellent computational skills rather than have an excellent academic achievement.
On the other hand, having many human related skills will be essential in later times. Despite scientist are working to develop perfect robots, they will never have same understanding, emotion and feeling as people. They will not be able to write poems and novels as people have done. Further and more importantly, even though they will be able to work as many occupations such as waiters, teachers, doctors and engineers, they will not be able to work on psychology which requires instinct feelings. For instance, an article by New York times in 2017 revealed that more than eight million people will have made redundant until 2023 after all industries have updated their technology to Industry 4.0 and being psychologist will be very common in the near future.
By way of conclusion, many qualifications which were extremely important in earlier times have become obsolete since there are innumerable machines and applications to do them consequently many people state that having conventional skills and methods are unnecessary. I agree with this sentiment to some extend because I would contend that these smart machines will not be able to perform some human related subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: SOME_EXTEND[1]
Message: Did you mean 'extent' ("extent" is a noun, "extend" is a verb)?
Suggestion: extent
...ry. I agree with this sentiment to some extend because I would contend that these smar...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, if, second, so, while, after all, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4057591623 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83742222551 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547120418848 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.3624684405 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0625 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.080062643438 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365516381822 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305820547595 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715236207046 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503589077745 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.