While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.
Employment is necessity for everyone in today's life to support their family. A young graduate always thinks that after acquiring all the qualifications and experience, he is ready to get a job of his caliber and satisfaction. Unfortunately, the recruiter has other ideas of hiring. A recent survey in newspaper has shown that most of the boss looks for a person's nature and adjustability ignoring the expertise he/she has. I disagree with this completely and will be stating my reasons ahead.
if you truly look at what benefit the employer will get with your personality rather than your working capability. The first thing is that the corporate environment needs knowledge and sense of mind for any task. Although, qualities shape a person's perspective but still the firm needs profitable results and targets. The second thing is a job seeker looks for smart, hard-working and devoted employees as at the end the company's future stands on all the people working there.
Even work should be provided looking on the current achievements and not on whether a person is an introvert or extrovert. As, the skills matter and not the looks. A wrong decision of the Human Resources Department of an MNC can put all the operations at stake if they fall for the outer appearance. Moreover, an appearance can be faked by anyone but the skills and experience are real and can be tested all the time to grant someone employment. Personal qualities might make a job seeker interesting and portray a great image but at the end it all comes down to the qualifications and experiences he/she possess that can make a difference.
In conclusion, all I can say that skills and experience cannot be replaced by just a mere personality. As, at the end companies are run by dedicated and smart employees and not some personality trait can change this fact.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...shown that most of the boss looks for a persons nature and adjustability ignoring the e...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 494, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y and will be stating my reasons ahead. if you truly look at what benefit the empl...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...and will be stating my reasons ahead. if you truly look at what benefit the empl...
^^
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...r any task. Although, qualities shape a persons perspective but still the firm needs pr...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'possesses'.
Suggestion: possesses
...e qualifications and experiences he/she possess that can make a difference. In conclu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, moreover, second, so, still, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89423076923 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90453061215 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592948717949 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2156995826 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4375 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14594008336 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459526883404 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505588084053 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084723902113 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.030597414111 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.