You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Attending a live performance (for example, a play, concert, or sporting event) is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion.
Live concerts are always fun to attend. Some people believe that attending a concert live is always more interesting than watching the same program on television. I contradict this belief because I think watching events like concerts, plays or matches on television is more convenient and enjoyable. And this essay will discuss the reasons with examples to support my point.
First of all, these days because of the huge gathering during live performances, it becomes very troublesome. Instead, watching shows on TV is way more very convenient and comfortable. These days people can pause and play any shows on television as per their own convenience. Furthermore, people do not have to worry about the traffic and parking problem which usually is the case in live concerts. Normally live concerts are very crowded and these shows are very prone to accidents and stampedes if are not organized well. Also, shows on TV is a viable option for elderly people who can not go and attend the live shows in person. Therefore, I beckon to attend these shows on TV with your near and dear one.
Besides, with the advancement in the telecommunication industry, technologies like 4K, OLED etc. enables you to watch TV with a lot of clarity and great sound effects. In stadiums, because of the distance between the audiences and the performers and noise, one can hardly understand or catch the actual action. So, people these days prefer to sit on their couches and enjoy the shows with their favorite drinks or snacks.
To recapitulate, I would second the point of watching live performances on TV. This essay highlighted the fact why the live performances at times become unpleasant to attend and why watching such shows on TV is always recommended.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, well, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9897260274 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79568494074 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561643835616 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2659916951 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.7058823529 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1764705882 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233762053648 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774439389479 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527969848583 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148318656504 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0705312782135 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.