Young people these days tend to be less polite and respectful than in the past. What are the causes and give your solutions?
Nowadays, there is a huge distinction in the lifestyle and behavior of youngsters compare to previous generations. They are more disrespectful and less polite towards other people. This essay will examine the reasons behind such behavorial issue, and will recommend some solutions to improve it.
To start with, firstly, youngsters of current time possess lack of patience in daily life activities. This is because in such a fast-paced world, they want outcomes of any scenario quickly, which bolster aggression in them. To illustrate this, adolescents often become more aggressive when they want things in their favour, whether it is about switching channels of television or having a new motorbike. Whereas in past, people tend to be more politeful and had patience for such things. To solve this problem, it is paramount to have regular friendly interactions with these youngsters about their lifestyle and habits. As a result, through these talks, it can help to wane off their aggressive nature.
Another reason why young people are disrespectful is that mostly they overlook to the wisdom of the elderly people. This is due to the fact that they want more freedom in their lifestyle choices. As a consequence, they develop practices of disrespecting other people in the society. To overcome this issue, parents and elder of the family should manifest youngsters about their traditional lifestyle, and strictly monitor their communication behavior, through which they will be polite and respectful to the members of the society.
To sum up, it is true that younsters, nowadays, have more audacity to be loud and disrespect towards others. However, I believe, through regular conversations with them and strictly monitoring their behavior, they can be back on the right
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...sion or having a new motorbike. Whereas in past, people tend to be more politeful and h...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... behavior, they can be back on the right
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, look, so, whereas, as a result, it is true, to start with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1503.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32978723404 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85393146424 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.150449853 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.2 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12620304436 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464852290205 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561429903492 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746817504007 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.017720474025 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.