27 Aug 2017: Some people believe that the media (for example: television, radio, newspapers, or Internet news sources) are less concerned nowadays with presenting accurate facts than they were in the past. These people argue that the media today often present incorrect information about news stories and that this causes problems for the public. Do you agree with this view? Why? Or why not?
In the recent decades, media has a prominent role in all the societies which can help people to have a deep understanding of their communities. I highly concur with the idea that media are more attention about the accuracy news being presented throughout the society rather than they have done in the past. In the following paragraphs, I will point out some significant arguments to elaborate on this perspective.
The first point that I would like to mention is the fact that people are becoming smarter by passing the time than before. Therefore, it would be more difficult that they accept some inaccurate news. Besides, if some media publish information which is not real, there are another news centers that they reveal the accurate news. To illustrate this point, Telegram is one the most important media in our country which it has approximately 40 million users. In addition, this application has news channels galore that many information comprising real and fake news are publishing every day. Statistics has been showing that the members of the fake news channels are decreasing because of finding the accurate information from other channels. According to the above mentioned, there would not be any way for some media not being scrupulous about all contains to maintain their popularities.
Another aspect of this issue and perhaps the substantial one is that how people could be attracted by the quality of materials is crucial for news centers. In fact, there are abundant news publishers throughout the world. Furthermore, the only promising way to take all attention of audiences is providing precise information; otherwise, they would lose their credibility. For instance, take the BBC news into account as an illustration. Plenty of people from all over the world are being updated by BBC. Should this broadcast has not paid attention to each spreading information, it would not be able to maintain its authority. Consequently, each media wanting to extend their affection through the people should be able to absorb not only the audiences but also government supporting.
Last but not least, all news broadcasting services have their own rules put by the government that they must follow them. Broadcasting incorrect information or stories enables the government to punish them, and this punishment would be detrimental to miss their credibility. Take IRIB news into consideration as an example. This news channel was famous in my country, but these days because of having some international penalties, their follower is decreasing gradually.
In conclusion, the media is the most important part of people’s lives so that they would pay attention to this fact. Not only each news center would consider that people are becoming smarter but also they need to attract people to be as their audiences. Regarding the governmental rules, it would be vital to maintaining their credibility.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
...plication has news channels galore that many information comprising real and fake ne...
^^^^
Line 2, column 516, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...plication has news channels galore that many information comprising real and fake news are publi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 15.1003584229 192% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 52.1666666667 109% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2447.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22863247863 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89151991024 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50641025641 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6953003235 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.958333333 100.406767564 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 5.45110844103 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219607445781 0.236089414692 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713488725256 0.076458572812 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487155033288 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139994431124 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424638478547 0.0645574589148 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.