Boys and girls should be educated in separate classrooms using different teaching techniques.
Formal education we get from school requires us to learn together with classmates, which can be both boys and girls, or separated. I personally think that gender has little to do with learning technique, and so teaching technique is not defined by it.
We’ve all heard the stereotype that girls tend to be more diligent than boys. Just like all stereoype, that’s not always the fact. It all comes back to each of their personal goals, what they need to accomplish and how they want to reach it. Some students want to work hard to accomplish their goal, while others are relatively more laid back. It doesn’t matter as long as the goals are accomplished. Other than responsibility to learn in school, students are also required to socialize with his/her classmates. Socializing with both gender can increase the social skills and make students understand how to deal with other people from both gender.
From the teacher’s side, teaching technique is personal and each teacher can have their own style of teaching. It all depends on how teacher understand the needs of his/her students and the approach they think best for the situation. If we want ideal teaching technique, it can be done by teaching each student with the approach suits them best. However, that cannot be possible in the setting of a classroom with a lot of students and only one teacher. The most feasible way is to use a flexible approach depends on the situation and the subject taught. That way, both teacher and student can improvise to explore the subject that needed to be mastered.
In conclusion, the separation of gender in classroom is not necessary for teaching reason. Learning technique is individual and affected by many other factors. The teacher understanding of the students’ need is the most defining factor in the teaching technique choice.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n together with classmates, which can be both boys and girls, or separated. I per...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al with other people from both gender. From the teacher's side, teaching t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 308.0 407.700716846 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06168831169 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79550356685 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532467532468 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 618.680645161 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.994623655914 101% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.9693950984 48.9658058833 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6111111111 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1111111111 20.6045352989 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.38888888889 5.45110844103 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140174009026 0.236089414692 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0474820110967 0.076458572812 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550188556857 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956852173545 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401182579604 0.0645574589148 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 86.8835125448 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.