Corruption
It is suggested that in numerous nations, corruptions still exist pervasively regardless of the enactments of strict laws. Subsequently, supportive opinions about the allowance for corruptions are documented as well as opposed ones. From my point of view, I side with the latter group although the former obtain its own reasons as follows.
To commence with, the presentation of bribery would play an important role in the society, in particular, the economically disadvantaged regions. Obviously, corruption would ensure better income for the receivers to decrease the financial burdens in the family; in other words, they would secure adequate money to purchase desirable products. In evidence, the average wage of teachers in Vietnam is 5 million dong meanwhile they would demand greater quantity to pay for daily expenses such as fuel, electrical bills or tuition fees of their offspring, which means that corruption is reasonable. Furthermore, that the corruption would stabilize earnings for inhabitants may be reckoned as an incentive for them to perform better in working since they are not concerned too much about financial problems.
On the other hand, eliminating the corruption in society would be a momentous step to guarantee the equality for the citizens. Admittedly, in some nations, the encroachment of power to gain money is implicitly transform corruption into concepts. This would directly induce the citizens’ worries about collecting sufficient budgets and donate to other individuals with the hope to receive assistance or even ingratiation. To illustrate, in Vietnam, the fundamental condition to secure an occupation with salary at approximate 8 million dong in state-run office is 200 million dong, which is not national law but the social established rules. Hence, for wealthy citizens, this is not an enormous investment; nonetheless, for the poverty, the inability to bear money would put them into the tragedies such as losing the opportunity to accomplish desirable careers or not gain assistances from authority. In other words, it would be reckoned as a tytification of discrimination towards poor inhabitants.
Equally important, national developments would be hindered by the popularity of corruption, especially the economy. Firstly, the inclination towards prosperous individuals who are capable of obtaining large quantity of money to secure high positions rather than well-qualified ones with limited budgets would degrade the quality of management system. In some circumstances, by corruption, some citizens without education in poor nations are abusing power to manipulate the employees possessing better skills. This would influence the working environment since they do not want to follow inferiors directors; worsen, internal conflicts are inevitable and eventually, the working efficiency would decrease. Secondly, bribery would motivate the implementation of illegal actions which would disturb the stability of community. In evidence, some firms may take advantages of money to ingratiate the authority with a hope to gain private benefits such as dodging taxation, acquiring illegal contracts or transporting banned products, which would have repercussions on national budgets.
With the mentioned statements, corruption would be an effective method to improve income for the citizens and ensure better performance in working. Nevertheless, the justice of citizens and national developments would be more rational to cease this propensity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 211, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'transformed'.
Suggestion: transformed
...nt of power to gain money is implicitly transform corruption into concepts. This would di...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...rimination towards poor inhabitants. Equally important, national developments would ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, in particular, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 9.8082437276 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 8.0752688172 372% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2988.0 1977.66487455 151% => OK
No of words: 518.0 407.700716846 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76833976834 4.8611393121 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77070365392 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1635879136 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 212.727598566 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555984555985 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 939.6 618.680645161 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.51630824373 119% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.994623655914 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8963900617 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.285714286 100.406767564 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.6045352989 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.95238095238 5.45110844103 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170893645177 0.236089414692 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687293291066 0.076458572812 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0901620569703 0.0737576698707 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130522276327 0.150856017488 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0785573628043 0.0645574589148 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 11.7677419355 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 58.1214874552 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.1575268817 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 10.9000537634 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.59 8.01818996416 132% => OK
difficult_words: 189.0 86.8835125448 218% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.