Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Nowday people life depend on various factors, a wide range of index influanced on happienes and satisfactory level of people lives. Some scientist and sociologist believe that quickly change in modern days caused that people life have become less happy or dissatisfactory against the past, some other groups of sociologist disagree. I am disagree with the claim too, I will elaborate my reasons next paragraphs.
The firt exquisite reason that I must mention is communication development, In the last of 20th century communication improved widely, many of networks such internet and electronic services devised that create enormous capacity to make easier life. For example online shops has made people all over the word able to shop online without exit of their homes in one hand people are capable to visit and select their requirement and goods and pay online easily without any tiredness and struggles and the other hand they have this chance to compare their selection among thousands of other oppurtiunity. My own experience could be a suitable case, I am one employee and a Ph.D student simulatiounsly I don't have no free time I must do many work when I am in work online shop is the best choice for me I am sitting in my work room and I purchase home nedding. This option of online communication could improve my happienss actually. This is true about other people undoubtedly.
The second idea that is so great for me is sanitary improvement. The level of sanitary and immuny proggress in the last years improve the longavity and people experience long longavity camparative than the past. When people have a better infrastructure and modern facilitate in the recurement they have high range of hoping and satisfactory this is not a rejectable idea. The last studies in London Institute Of Recurement And Tratement depicted that a few more than 81 percent of Europian People live in less buffer of 1 kilometers of a sanitary center this show all people not only have a accessable family doctor but also they have periodcly check program. For more evidence when I were traveling in Tramva last month ago I have a old man fellow traveler, he said the Paris county sanitary network have a very nice cover in this area, he told if a person become sick, the emergency could reach less than 5 minuets only. While this situation don't experienced at 20 yeras ago at all.
In short, even thought the satisfactory and the happinies level of people have changed and some people believe that it is lower than past, in my opinion this is not true because communication development and sanitary improvement have made people more hopeful rather than past.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...er groups of sociologist disagree. I am disagree with the claim too, I will elaborate my...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 291, Rule ID: ALL_OVER_THE_WORD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'all over the world' (=globally)?
Suggestion: all over the world
...or example online shops has made people all over the word able to shop online without exit of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 672, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: D
...itable case, I am one employee and a Ph.D student simulatiounsly I dont have no f...
^
Line 2, column 699, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...yee and a Ph.D student simulatiounsly I dont have no free time I must do many work w...
^^^^
Line 2, column 732, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun work seems to be countable; consider using: 'many works'.
Suggestion: many works
...nsly I dont have no free time I must do many work when I am in work online shop is the be...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less buff'?
Suggestion: less buff
...n 81 percent of Europian People live in less buffer of 1 kilometers of a sanitary center th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 589, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...nter this show all people not only have a accessable family doctor but also they ...
^
Line 3, column 732, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...aveling in Tramva last month ago I have a old man fellow traveler, he said the Pa...
^
Line 3, column 909, Rule ID: MINUETS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'minutes'?
Suggestion: minutes
..., the emergency could reach less than 5 minuets only. While this situation dont experie...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 923, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y could reach less than 5 minuets only. While this situation dont experienced at 20 y...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 944, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...an 5 minuets only. While this situation dont experienced at 20 yeras ago at all. In...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, second, so, while, for example, in short, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.0752688172 223% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9131403118 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76233019439 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 212.727598566 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543429844098 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.1456302815 48.9658058833 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.066666667 100.406767564 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.9333333333 20.6045352989 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.5376344086 199% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224866541839 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729028898963 0.076458572812 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586885123154 0.0737576698707 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154267055081 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600759143508 0.0645574589148 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.1575268817 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.79 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.