Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children should only study or play and don’t have to do household chores.
Every parent has an ever growing dilemma regarding the most effective way to raise their children so they would turn into prosperous, healthy adults. One controversy in this regard concerns household chores. Many posit that taking on responsibilities around the house might have adverse effects on children, mainly on their academics and psychological well-being. I, on the contrary, believe designating certain chores for children can be very beneficial for them, both in the near present and future. I will briefly shed light on some reasons that will substantiate my viewpoint below.
A significant benefit house hold chores will have for children is that it will teach them about the value of responsibility, a mandatory asset for their future. Taking on even the simplest of chores around the house, like washing the dishes two times a week, will cause the children to feel responsible about the home being the environment they currently inhabit. This sense of responsibility will mount as they grow. In that sense, when these children turn into adult they have this incited sense of responsibility in other environments they dwell in, their work, their city, even their country. Responsible adults will rise against unpleasant situations and thrive to creat a better world.
Another important trait that will result from household chores is independence and self-reliance. It is evident that children are not going to have their parents with them at every stage throughout life. Thus, it is necessary that they should be familiarized with routine housework such as cooking and cleaning for they are to become independent and live separately from their caretakers. If a child is unfamiliar with these rudimentary tasks, he/she might not be able to look after him/herself in the future and have a sense of self-incompetence. Needless to say, this sense can be followed with detrimental outcomes, particularly in the work place. On that account, it is quite obvious that a set of house chores can have a positive impact on a child’s self-esteem and independence.
Regarding this debate, some might argue that household chores will divert the child’s attention from school work or deprive them of time to spend with friends and family. I have to oppose this statement by asserting that a balanced set of chores will teach the children about time management. They will learn to organize their time so they can attend to their work around the house, academic requirements and leisure activities. This beneficial trait will also be a great asset for them in their future, as time management is a major key to success.
To conclude, I believe many significant benefits can arise from obliging children to some basic work around the house, the greatest of them being a provoked sense of responsibility, independence and time-management. It should be mentioned that as advantageous as household chores are for children, parents should be aware not to go overboard and mount too much responsibilities on their loved ones. Therefore, in general it can be corroborated that a balanced set of responsibilities can help shape children into suites adults for the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...aware not to go overboard and mount too much responsibilities on their loved ones. T...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, in general, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 9.8082437276 265% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 63.0 43.0788530466 146% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 52.1666666667 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2666.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 511.0 407.700716846 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21722113503 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.75450408675 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03889888326 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485322896282 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 835.2 618.680645161 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5557790308 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.913043478 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2173913043 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30434782609 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120368688718 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441410561366 0.076458572812 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337493837643 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808127936201 0.150856017488 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290346245438 0.0645574589148 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 86.8835125448 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.