Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
By and large, it is established beyond doubt that it is incumbent upon the government to provide an opportunity for every given society to be flourished and make an impressive progress day in day out. Two of the most important area that government should allocate a vast sum of money are internet and public transportation without which our lives seem to be paralyzed. Various point of view which are germane to the matter being discussed brings us to the moot question as to whether the government should dedicate a hoard of money to improve internet or public transportation. However, the popular sentiment to which I vehemently cling is that both ideas play a pivotal role in every nation but without internet hardly can any society thrive and reach a conspicuous success. The following paragraphs will aptly substantiate my personal stance.
To commence with, internet and public transportations are the basic needs and indispensable part of every given society in all around the globe. Indeed, hardly can people imagine their lives without these two significant technologies. Generally phrased, the internet might be more important than any other technologies owing to the fact that success of a nation, education, progress and so forth are all dependent on the internet. As a tangible example, if the government does not allocate a substantial amount of budget on the internet, we will soon witness a lagging society with the highest range of dropout rate among university students because the internet could guarantee the success of a society when it comes to education. Also, students will not be able to surf the net and gain loads of information. To elucidate more on this issue, although public transportation should be improved extensively, the internet can provide fertile ground for humans to make a progress in the different realm.
Another equally salient point in corroboration my stance is the fact that with high-speed internet coverage people in every corner of the world can keep in touch and get informed of many things that happen to them. For instance, my brother is studying at a university abroad and we talk whenever we want and like by the internet. One of the startling facts which flabbergasted me is that vast majority of people are inclined toward the opinion that internet and computer are not the best means of communication. It can be deduced from a combination of breadth of coverage and depth of detail that internet accessibility will solve many problems that may come across in any given society.
However, every coin has two sides. Development of public transportation will provide an opportunity for people to get to their destination in time due to the fact that it covers all regions in the metropolitan cities. However, it was a story in a nutshell; actually, there are more reasonable grounds that can lend weight to my personal stance.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 471, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...iscussed brings us to the moot question as to whether the government should dedicate a hoard ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 967, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'progress'.
Suggestion: progress
...ovide fertile ground for humans to make a progress in the different realm. Another equ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, so, as to, for instance, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.0752688172 235% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2459.0 1977.66487455 124% => OK
No of words: 485.0 407.700716846 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07010309278 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93480077434 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 251.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517525773196 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 784.8 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.8258425791 48.9658058833 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.421052632 100.406767564 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5263157895 20.6045352989 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190308037073 0.236089414692 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559849230967 0.076458572812 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0450852074781 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981297364528 0.150856017488 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460009703291 0.0645574589148 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 86.8835125448 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.